The experience curve (BCG)
How can the experience curve (bcg) support strategic choice or positioning?
Contents
In the previous tool, a focus strategy was shown to combine elements of both the differentiation and low-cost strategies.
The experience curve connects accumulated output with the possibility of lower unit cost. It supports a low-cost strategy—and may strengthen a focused position—but only when the organisation captures and protects the learning created by volume.
When to use it
Consider it whenever market-share growth could produce a sustainable cost advantage.
Origins
Industrial learning curves predate Boston Consulting Group. Early aircraft-production studies found that each doubling of cumulative output could reduce labour time per unit by roughly 10–15 per cent. BCG broadened the observation from labour to the total value-added cost of standard products and connected it to competitive strategy.
The experience curve became an important assumption behind BCG’s Growth/Share Matrix: if accumulated experience lowers cost, relative market share may indicate relative cost position.
What it is
The original learning insight was that repetition improves task performance. Early aviation evidence suggested a 10–15 per cent reduction in labour time after cumulative production doubled.
The experience curve
Cumulative volume
BCG studies across consumer and industrial sectors proposed a broader ‘law of experience’: the unit cost of value added to a standard product commonly falls by a constant percentage—often 20 to 30 per cent—whenever cumulative output doubles.
Important mechanisms include:
- Labour efficiency:
- workers and managers learn better sequences, shortcuts and problem-solving methods.
- Process efficiency:
- workflows become standardised, balanced and less wasteful.
- Technology efficiency:
- automation and improved equipment reduce inputs or increase throughput.
- Design and sourcing:
- accumulated knowledge can simplify products, improve yields and strengthen purchasing.
BCG’s strategic interpretation was more distinctive than the underlying observation. If cumulative volume creates cost leadership, a company may rationally prioritise share and production before short-term profit, then use lower cost to reduce price, expand volume and reinforce the advantage.
Relative market share and the experience curve effect: an example
Continue your preview
Read more of The experience curve (BCG).
Create a free account to continue this advanced article preview. Complete access is available with Pro or an eligible outcome pack, so you can see the value before deciding to upgrade.