Discovery-driven growth (McGrath)
How can discovery-driven growth (mcgrath) support strategic choice or positioning?
Contents
That is the catchy credo of discovery-driven growth. Rita McGrath and Ian MacMillan had been studying for over two decades why so many well-conceived.
“Fail fast, fail cheap” captures discovery-driven growth: in a highly uncertain venture, the first plan is a set of assumptions to test, not a forecast to defend. Rita Gunther McGrath and Ian MacMillan developed the approach after studying why carefully planned growth initiatives fail even in well-managed companies.
When to use it
- Use it for products or markets with high uncertainty, especially a new product entering a new market. The product/market matrix helps distinguish that situation.
- Think like a venture investor: maintain several opportunities with meaningful upside, cap total exposure, buy small learning options and fund the next step only when evidence justifies it. Accept that many options will stop.
Origins
McGrath and MacMillan developed discovery-driven planning in earlier work and consolidated the growth process in Discovery-Driven Growth: A Breakthrough Process to Reduce Risk and Seize Opportunity, published in 2009. Their central contribution was to reverse conventional planning under uncertainty: make assumptions visible, test them at planned checkpoints and control exposure before committing the full investment.
What it is
Fail fast, fail cheap.
The 2009 framework helps managers select growth opportunities, learn quickly and either scale them successfully or discontinue them at low cost. It challenges the use of conventional planning as if uncertain ventures were predictable extensions of the core business.
A typical proposal arrives as a 100+ slide deck containing a market gap, proposed offer, resource plan and precise forecasts supported by spreadsheets of revenue, cost, NPV, IRR and sensitivity analysis. In an unfamiliar market, those numbers will inevitably change.
Once the board approves a large commitment, emerging evidence may show that demand, product design or distribution differs from the plan. Yet teams become psychologically and politically committed and revise the deck to defend continuation instead of reconsidering the venture.
DCF, NPV and IRR remain useful under normal uncertainty; see Making the strategic investment decision. In a high-uncertainty venture, however, rigid application can hide what is not known. Treat the initial investment as an option: the right, not the obligation, to make the next investment after learning.
Break a large venture into components, each with a small commitment and explicit evidence requirement. The team avoids rebuilding a 100 slide defence, the organisation responds faster and total downside remains contained.
An options-oriented investment strategy
Continue your preview
Read more of Discovery-driven growth (McGrath).
Create a free account to continue this advanced article preview. Complete access is available with Pro or an eligible outcome pack, so you can see the value before deciding to upgrade.