Organisational behaviourFramework / modelModelAccessible

Negotiating techniques: BATNA

How can negotiating techniques: batna support strategic choice or positioning?

AccessibleTacticalIndividual2 min read

Contents

BATNA stands for ‘best alternative to a negotiated agreement’.

BATNA means “best alternative to a negotiated agreement”: the course of action you would choose if the current negotiation produced no deal. It is the standard against which you compare a proposed agreement, not a threat or a predetermined demand.

When to use it

Before negotiating employment, property, procurement or another personal agreement.

When an organisation handles an acquisition, partnership, supplier dispute, labour matter or other complex negotiation.

High-stakes legal, employment or financial matters may require qualified advice.

Origins

Roger Fisher and William Ury introduced the BATNA label in their 1981 book Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. The broader idea of preparing a fallback is much older, but the term focused principled-negotiation practice on improving outside options rather than becoming trapped by positions at the table. Later editions are also associated with Bruce Patton.

What it is

Your BATNA is what you will actually do if agreement fails. It is not merely any alternative, and it may be uncertain.

A company negotiating distribution for a new consumer product might sell through a smaller chain, sell directly online, delay the launch, redesign the offer or stop. Compare these alternatives on value, probability, timing, cost, reputation, relationships and reversibility. The best one becomes the provisional BATNA.

The reservation point—the least favourable deal you would accept—can be derived by translating the BATNA into terms comparable with the proposed agreement. It is not identical to the BATNA itself.

How to use it

List realistic actions available if no agreement is reached.

Improve promising options through research, approvals and preparation.

Evaluate each on a common basis, including uncertainty and implementation risk.

Select the current best alternative and identify the reservation point.

Revisit both as information and circumstances change.

Then explore interests behind stated positions. A flexible agreement may create value through timing, scope, risk allocation, service or contingencies that a single price cannot capture.

Negotiation dynamics

Estimate the other party’s alternatives without pretending to know them. An EATNA—estimated alternative to a negotiated agreement—can make that uncertainty explicit. In a job negotiation, an employer may be able to approach another candidate, but the cost, delay and fit of doing so remain uncertain.

Reveal a BATNA only when the information is accurate, disclosure serves your purpose and you understand the consequences. A strong alternative can establish credibility. A weak alternative is usually kept private, but privacy is not permission to lie, fabricate offers or misrepresent authority. Deception can be unethical, unlawful and destructive of reputation.

Protect confidential information and power-sensitive parties. Do not use BATNA reasoning to coerce someone who lacks safe alternatives. In labour, family, legal or public-interest disputes, rights, process and durable relationships may constrain what is negotiable.

Top practical tip

Strengthen your real alternatives before bargaining, then translate the best one into the same dimensions as the proposed deal. This creates a reasoned walk-away standard.

Top pitfall

Do not confuse a hoped-for fallback with an executable BATNA, or assume you know the other side’s. Overconfidence and internal pressure can produce an agreement worse than walking away.