Find the Bright Spots
How can find the bright spots support strategic choice or positioning?
Contents
A method for finding existing success inside a problem and cloning the behaviors that produce it.
Find the Bright Spots is a change method for locating places where the desired result already occurs under current conditions, identifying the behaviours that enable it and helping others reproduce those behaviours.
When to use it
- When root-cause analysis produces a long list of problems but little movement.
- When people are sceptical of a solution imported from elsewhere.
- When some individuals, teams or moments already outperform the local norm.
- When the change needs a concrete starting behaviour rather than a broad aspiration.
Origins
Chip and Dan Heath present “find the bright spots” in Switch as part of directing the rational side of change. The method is closely related to positive deviance, which studies unusually successful members of a community who face the same constraints as their peers, and to solution-focused practice, which examines exceptions to a problem. Its central premise is that an existing local success can reveal both a feasible solution and credible evidence that change is possible.
What it is
A bright spot is a positive exception: a person, team, case or period that achieves more of the desired outcome without privileged conditions that make comparison meaningless. The method changes the question from “What causes all of this failure?” to “Where is the problem absent or less severe, and what is happening differently there?”
The unit of learning is behaviour, not personality. A useful bright spot yields a practice that other people can observe, try and adapt with comparable resources. The example is evidence for a hypothesis, not proof that one behaviour caused the result.
How to use it
Define the desired outcome precisely enough to recognise an exception. Search the relevant data and ask frontline participants where performance is unexpectedly good. Check that the apparent bright spot is real, sustained and genuinely comparable.
Observe the work. Identify specific actions, sequences, cues and environmental supports that differ from the norm. Ask what would happen if others tried them and look for alternative explanations such as easier customers, extra resources or selection effects.
Turn the strongest practice into a small test with a similar group. Let local participants adapt it, measure both the result and unintended effects, and spread it through demonstration and peer learning if the evidence holds.
The same logic works in personal change: identify occasions when the problem was less intense, reconstruct what was different and repeat the smallest controllable behaviour.
Top practical tip
Choose bright spots from a context the target group recognises as comparable. Show the practice in action, specify the cue and behaviour, and run a small replication before scaling. Local proof reduces scepticism only when people can see that the constraints really are similar.
Top pitfall
Do not celebrate a star performer and call the work complete. Exceptional results may depend on hidden advantages, sacrifice or behaviour that cannot scale. Separate the repeatable practice from the person, test competing explanations and verify that copying it does not create harm elsewhere.
Further reading
- Heath, C. and Heath, D. (twenty ten). Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard. Broadway Books.
- Pascale, R., Sternin, J. and Sternin, M. (twenty ten). The Power of Positive Deviance. Harvard Business Press.