The corporate restructuring hexagon (McKinsey)
How should the corporate restructuring hexagon (mckinsey) be measured and interpreted?
Contents
As set out in the preceding tool, the objective of M&A activities is to create incremental shareholder value to the corporate entity – by buying.
Corporate transactions create value only when an owner can improve a business, combine it advantageously or transfer it to someone who values it more. McKinsey’s restructuring hexagon broadens that logic into a comparison between current market value and the value potentially available through communication, operations, disposals, growth and financial design.
When to use it
- Ask whether the firm’s current market value is materially below its defensible potential value.
- Decompose the gap, identify its largest drivers and improve the probability-adjusted value of the relevant initiatives; see Expected value and sensitivity analysis.
- Apply the same reasoning to a private company by estimating notional value rather than relying on a quoted share price.
Origins
McKinsey developed the hexagon within its corporate-finance and restructuring practice to show the successive sources of value that management—or an acquirer—might unlock. The framework reflects a shareholder-value view of the corporation and the market for corporate control: a persistent gap between current and attainable value can attract an activist, competitor or financial buyer.
What it is
The model identifies five routes from current market value towards maximum potential value:
- Perception management:
- communicate credible evidence about competitiveness, cash generation and prospects so investors can value the company more accurately. Communication cannot create operating value, but it may reduce an unjustified information gap.
- Operational improvement:
- redesign processes, improve productivity or use approaches such as Business process redesign (Hammer and Champy) and Outsourcing where they create real net benefit.
- Disposals:
- sell businesses that another owner can operate or combine more effectively, ideally after correcting avoidable operational and financial weaknesses.
- Growth opportunities:
- create value through credible organic initiatives, acquisitions or partnerships.
- Financial engineering:
- adjust the capital structure to improve equity value without creating an unacceptable probability of distress.
The corporate restructuring hexagon
The distance between current value and restructured value is the maximum theoretical ‘raider opportunity’. If incumbent management cannot close a credible part of the gap, another owner may attempt to do so through a takeover, leveraged buyout or strategic combination. The model is a diagnostic, not evidence that every estimated uplift can be realised or added together without interaction.
Continue your preview
Read more of The corporate restructuring hexagon (McKinsey).
Create a free account to continue this advanced article preview. Complete access is available with Pro or an eligible outcome pack, so you can see the value before deciding to upgrade.