keymodels
Menu
StrategyFramework / modelModelAccessible

Setting SMART objectives

How can setting smart objectives support strategic choice or positioning?

AccessibleStrategicTeam2 min read
Contents

You may aim for the goal of UK market leadership in a key segment by 2023. That is a worthy goal, but a bit too vague for a robust strategy.

“Achieve UK market leadership in a priority segment by 2023” is directional but incomplete. A robust objective must define the measure, target, scope, evidence and deadline clearly enough to guide action and review.

When to use it

  • Use SMART objectives throughout strategy development and implementation.
  • Link strategic goals to milestones and key performance indicators.
  • Use the drafting process to expose ambiguity, ownership and measurement gaps.
  • Revisit objectives when evidence changes while preserving a record of the original commitment.

Origins

George T. Doran introduced the SMART acronym in a management article in the early nineteen eighties. His original words included specific, measurable, assignable, realistic and time-related. Later practice produced variants such as attainable or achievable and relevant. The mnemonic’s value lies in disciplined specification, not in one sacred expansion of the letters.

What it is

Peter Drucker warned that institutions can mistake good intentions for objectives. SMART turns a direction into a testable commitment.

Goals describe the destination or desired state in words. Objectives define measurable progress or completion. A useful objective also states the responsible owner, baseline, data source, review cadence and safeguards.

SMART does not guarantee that the objective is strategically wise. A perfectly specified target can drive gaming, tunnel vision or harm if it measures the wrong outcome.

How to use it

Write objectives that are:

Specific – name the outcome, population, segment, geography and relevant boundary.

Measurable – define the indicator, baseline, target, data source and acceptable uncertainty. Not everything important is easily quantified; use qualitative acceptance evidence where appropriate rather than inventing a poor proxy.

Attainable – test whether the capability, authority and resources exist. The objective should be challenging without relying on fantasy.

Relevant – connect the measure to the strategic goal and explain why moving it should create the intended outcome.

Time-limited – state the deadline and intermediate review points. A deadline creates focus but should not reward unsafe shortcuts.

In the historical example, the SMART objective paired a segment market-share goal with 35 per cent against a current 29 per cent, measured through subscribed market research and due in 2023. Because that date has passed, it should be assessed as a historical commitment, not reused as a current target.

SMART objectives

Setting SMART objectives

Richard Rumelt’s 2011 Good Strategy, Bad Strategy describes “proximate objectives”: targets close enough to be achievable given present knowledge and resources. The idea reinforces attainability while allowing ambition to be sequenced. President Kennedy’s moon commitment appeared extraordinary, but relevant technical capability made a credible path possible.

For each objective, define leading actions and lagging outcomes, name an owner and specify what management will do if progress differs from plan. Review the objective without moving the target merely to protect a score.

Top practical tip

Read the objective to someone outside the team and ask them to identify the outcome, owner, evidence, deadline and decision threshold. Any disagreement reveals ambiguity before it becomes implementation conflict.

Top pitfall

Do not attach many metrics to every goal. One or two well-designed objectives across 4 to 5 strategic goals are easier to govern, but even a small set must be checked for gaming, conflict and unintended harm.

Further reading

  • Doran, G.T. (nineteen eighty-one). “There’s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management’s Goals and Objectives.” Management Review.
  • Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. (two thousand and two). “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation.” American Psychologist.