Inclusive team health review
Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups?
Contents
A practical checklist / diagnostic addressing this question: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups?
The diagnostic goal
Use the inclusive team health review to locate the specific conditions behind this question: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? The working view makes access, participation, and assignments visible so discussion can move from general opinion to a specific action or decision.
When to run it
Run the inclusive team health review before a consequential review or change in team development, when symptoms are visible but the underlying condition is still unclear. Repeat it when the evidence for access, participation, and assignments changes, rather than on a calendar alone.
What it tests
The inclusive team health review is an evidence-based review that keeps healthy, watch, gap, and unknown states visibly distinct. Its core working elements are access, participation, assignments, and feedback. Those elements belong together because each changes how the others should be interpreted or acted on.
Diagnostic dimensions
Access
Capture access only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to participation so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Participation
Capture participation only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to assignments so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Assignments
Capture assignments only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to feedback so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Feedback
Capture feedback only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to recognition so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Recognition
Capture recognition only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to progression so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Progression
Capture progression only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to belonging so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Belonging
Capture belonging only at the level needed to answer: Do assessment, recognition, meetings, opportunity access, and daily norms work fairly across groups? Use observable evidence, name any unresolved judgment, and state what action or choice this entry can change. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to evidence so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Evidence
Name the evidence, its date and owner, and any limitation that affects how confidently it can be used. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to actions so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Actions
Write a concrete next action with one owner, a due date or trigger, and a visible completion condition. Within the inclusive team health review, connect this entry to evidence so the relationship can be reviewed rather than inferred.
Continue your preview
Read more of Inclusive team health review.
Create a free account to continue this advanced article preview. Complete access is included in Pro and Team, so you can see the value before deciding to upgrade.