Compare

Return on innovation investment (ROI2) vs Return on investment (ROI)

These models cover closely related ground. Compare their purpose, scope, practical guidance, and supporting resources to choose the better fit.

Related modelsFinanceFinanceFinance

Operations

Return on innovation investment (ROI2)

Helps managers answer: To what extent are our investments in innovation generating a return?

Finance

Helps managers answer: How well are we generating sustainable profits?

Choice logic

Return on innovation investment (ROI2)

Answer the key performance question: “To what extent are our investments in innovation generating a return?”

Return on investment (ROI)

Answer the key performance question: “How well are we generating sustainable profits?”

Extracted signals

Publish a metric dictionary with cost boundaries, benefit attribution, time horizon and treatment of failed experiments.

Do not optimise the pipeline for retrospective ROI2 alone. It can encourage teams to underinvest in uncertain discovery, attribute all launch profit to the latest project, hide failures and ignore learning, cannibalisation or long dated platform value.

Make every ROI auditable: publish the counterfactual, costs, benefits, timing and attribution owner. Distinguish an annual period such as 1 January to 31 December from annualisation. Under a simple convention, 1% for a month becomes 12%, while 10% over two years becomes 5%; a compound annual rate is more appropriate when returns accumulate.

Do not compare marketer, project and investor ROI labels without reconciling definitions. One may use gross profit over campaign cost and another net income over all capital employed. Also avoid confusing annual with annualised return or ignoring risk, cash flow timing and benefits displaced from elsewhere.

Each comparison links back to the full articles so you can inspect examples, steps, caveats, and related templates before choosing.

Application bridge